DRILL HERE

 

Robert P Denoncour

7040 W Palmetto Park Rd # 4-292

Boca Raton, Fl 33433

Bob@Denoncour.com

 

DRILL NOW

 

THE 2008 ELECTION 

Reap what you sow.

Are they "Haters?"

For eight years Liberals kept saying Bush is stupid. Bush lied. Bush this and Bush that. These hate filled malfunctioning masses demonstrated the lowest levels of civilized behavior.

For eight years pseudo intellectuals planted “Hatred” and fertilized it with Bogus Speech (B.S.). Obama grew out of these labors and is the Harvest and Product of this extreme hatred.  Haters like Reverend (“Goddamned America”) Wright and the terrorist William (“Wish I blew up more”) Ayres nurtured Obama and brought him to the marketplace of politics.

I find comfort in seeing the system works predictably. Our HARVEST is what was PLANTED. We conservatives know how to get better results next time around.

GET-RID-OF-THE-WEEDS!  Avoid Hate. Avoid those that hate. Do not follow the Liberal's example. Avoid temptation from the dark side to hate.

When we hear someone planting hate filled liberal seeds, we must speak up and get rid of the parasitic weeds. When we hear “B.S.” talking points.... we must challenge them. Don't make it easy for the weeds to grow.

Conservatives must speak up and explain.:

1.      God is good and following His Commandments is the way to PEACE.

2.      All life is Sacred. Life begins at conception and ends at Natural Death.

3.      Evil does exist and must be confronted and defeated.

4.      The Constitution is the most perfect document ever written. The Constitution must be respected and followed especially by those in the Judiciary Branch of Government.

5.      Capitalism works and is far superior to the proven failure of Socialism

6.      Free Speech is imperative to freedom. The Fairness Doctrine is not fair and is, in fact, an attempt to limit free speech.

7.      When the hate filled Liberals MOCK and Ridicule conservative values, they will be confronted and exposed for what they are.

8.      Conservative religious values built the United States into the Greatest Country. Cheapening the First Amendment is as un-American as one can get. Our religious values must guide our actions. Any politician that defines the First Amendment as “Separation of Church and State is PROSTITUTING our Constitution. That politician is cheapening our Constitution in order to by-pass the intent of God, our Founding Fathers, and the Constitution.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Nowhere does it say Religion should be excluded, condemned, mocked, ridiculed, or disingenuously patronized. WHAT are the Liberals thinking?

We are told to love the sinner and hate the sin. This takes courage, understanding, and discipline. We can compromise our methods. We cannot compromise our values.

POLITICS

   

 It seems to me that we would be much better off if politicians would be more accurate in the words they choose to use.

I believe that if they don't choose to be CLEAR about their Policies... they must be ashamed of their Policies.

 

ABORTION

 

WAR.......PEACE....... and ..... INJUSTICE

   Using a "controversial" example like ABORTION try to define what people want and what they say they want.

    One side is called "Pro-Life, yet quite often they are NOT pro-LIFE as many of these people can justify Capital Punishment and "War".

    In reality the "Pro-Life" crowd is very specifically ANTI-ABORTION. They do NOT believe the killing of unborn human babies is acceptable, civilized, or moral behavior. It is fair to say that they will answer the question: "Are you against abortion?" with a very direct: "Yes, I am against abortion." 

    I do not understand why they use the term "Pro-Life" .  "Anti-Abortion" is more accurate in describing their beliefs. It is especially confusing because this most violent act of abortion on face value is barbaric.

   

This is the controversy! Some people do not view this as a human baby.

    The other side is called "Pro-Choice", yet quite often they are NOT pro-CHOICE.

    For example.... chose to say a prayer to God aloud in a public school and many of these people will only discuss how harsh your punishment should be.

    They believe that the killing of babies like the one pictured above is acceptable and even heroic behavior. They encourage abortions by contributing to abortion clinics like "Family Planning" and openly oppose any public discussion of the controversy. They have had laws passes that prevent protests near abortion clinics for example.

    It would be more accurate if they would call themselves "Pro-Abortionists". As this is what they want.... the proliferation and admiration of abortion.

Ask someone in this group a basic question like: "Are you pro abortion?" They will NOT give a direct answer like: "Yes, I am for abortions."  No, they will cloak their answer in platitudes like: "It's a woman's right to chose".

    The logic is confused.

One cannot say: "I'm against bank robbery, but for the bank robbers right to chose."

One cannot say: "I'm against speeding, but for the speeders right to chose."

But this group sees no conflict of logic in: "I'm personally opposed to abortion, but I'm for the woman's right to chose."

In neurotic DENIAL, they refuse to admit that a human life is killed in an abortion. How can they have a valid point if they need to deny reality to state their position? In truth, they deny others from speaking the obvious.

    It may surprise some to see President Jimmy Carter's opinion on the subject of abortion.

Click HERE                     

 

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."                            Edmund Burke
 

Sometimes politicians agree on substance and in concept, but not on the definition of a word.

    Those in the so called "Anti-War Movement" believe themselves to be morally superior  because they are "Against War" and for "Peace". They believe that the opposite of  PEACE is WAR.  PEACE is good, WAR is bad. Therefore any president that would commit to war is bad.

    This group tends to blame President Nixon for getting us into Viet Nam. This is PROOF to these people that Republicans "Like War". The fact is that President Johnson escalated Viet Nam LONG before President Nixon became president. However, this group does not like to be bothered with facts.

    More recently the so called "Anti-War" group is calling President Bush many disgusting names for deciding to over-throw Saddam Hussein in Iraq. They believe that President Bush "Broke the Peace" by starting this "WAR". To them, the world was at peace because they did not see two opposing forces in battle. No TANKS were shooting at each other, two army's were not locked in battle, and the air force from two nations were not bombing each other's country. The world was at "Peace". Therefore President Bush started the war, according to this group. In their minds, President Bush and those who support him are "Pro War". Therefore George Bush and Bush supporters are bad. 

The Opposite of Peace is Injustice.

    I believe that the OPPOSITE of PEACE is not WAR. I believe the OPPOSITE of PEACE is INJUSTICE. When Hitler was killing millions of Jews and other innocent peoples, THE WORLD WAS NOT A PEACE! The Jews and other innocents did not have TANKS, and GUNS, and POWER. They cold not fight back and they were slaughtered. Today's "Anti-War" group would say that the world was at peace and President Roosevelt was wrong for "Starting" this WAR.

    When Saddam Hussein was killing 160,00 Kurds with poison gas ( That's right he had a weapon of mass destruction, and 160,000 dead Kurds is proof of that.) the world was not at peace. There was a most unjust war going on. However, the Kurds did not have tanks, or guns, or power. They were slaughtered. They could not fight back. The "Anti-War" group said the world was at peace and we could not go to war.

    Then 3000 innocent Americans were killed in the World Trade Center bombings. President Bush instantly realized the world was NOT at PEACE and we could no longer avoid the WAR that was going on. The debate continues and name calling does not help.

    In fact, the "Anti-War" group, and those willing to go to a "Just War" both want the same outcome. They both want PEACE. One group believes that evil must be confronted and destroyed. The other group (anti-war) believe that we can resolve injustice by discussing the problem with the likes of Hitler and Hussein.

They believe the Englishman NEVILLE  CHAMBERLAIN was right when he declared just before the German  invasion of Poland "We have...Peace for our Time" .

 

"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
    because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me--
    and there was no one left to speak out for me."

Martin Niemoeller

Maybe this Niemoeller quote describing that Nazi take-over in Germany best describes the need to protect those least able to protect themselves.

 

 

"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.

Teach a man to fish and he will eat for the rest of his life."

                                                                (Chinese proverb)

Liberals      Moderates      Progressives 

Conservatives

(They keep changing what they want to be called.)

(Still Conservatives)

Give a man a fish.

Propose that government gives the fish. Always a government responsibility. Fish paid with taxes from "The Rich". People remain dependent of government. Vote for liberals.

Propose public school system teach "Liberal, Progressive, non-judgmental, amoral philosophy as priority over reading writing and arithmetic.

Probable motivation is to make population dependent on government.

Give a Liberal a THOUGHT and he'll repeat it mindlessly all day.

Teach a man to fish

Propose the vast majority of able people get their own fish. People contribute to society, and do not look at government for solutions. Vote for conservatives.

Propose public school system TEACH children reading, writing, arithmetic. Want to TEST to be sure: No Child Left Behind. Therefore children learn to care for themselves.

Probable motivation is to provide financial health and equal opportunity for all.

Teach a Liberal to think for himself and he'll vote Conservative for the rest of his life.